Yes No Share to Facebook
Uttering Threats Charges:
Alleged Breach of Section 264.1 of the Criminal Code
Last Updated: July 01 2026
Question: Can a person charged with uttering threats under Canadian law get Legal Help in Ontario, and what penalties and defence options should they understand?
Answer: Hogan Paralegal Services Legal Help can assist you in Ontario if you’ve been charged with uttering threats, a serious hybrid offence under Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, section 264.1 that may lead to up to five (5) years in jail if prosecuted as an indictable offence, or up to two (2) years less a day on summary conviction, depending on the specific threat and circumstances. A Paralegal can help you review the exact words, context, and whether the Crown can prove a real threat beyond a reasonable doubt, and discuss practical defence approaches such as arguing the statement was not a threat, offering an alternate plausible interpretation, or challenging the identity of the accused and the intended recipient. If you need prompt guidance before your next court step, call (905) 634-2100 to book a consult with Hogan Paralegal Services.
Is Uttering Threats a Serious Issue?
An Uttering Threats Charge Per Section 264.1 of the Criminal Code Is a Serious Legal Matter Involving the Potential Penalty Upon Conviction of Up to Five (5) Years Imprisonment If Prosecuted As An Indictable Offence.
Understanding the Criminal Charge of Uttering Threats Including Potential Penalties and Available Defence Strategies
The criminal offence of uttering threats is known as a hybrid offence meaning that the prosecution of an uttering threats charge may proceed as an indictable offence and therefore as a very serious matter that may result in imprisonment for a maximum of five (5) years depending upon how the threat was made, who or what the threat was directed towards, and the consequences that occurred, if any, as a result of the uttered threat. Alternatively, an uttering threats charge may proceed as a summary conviction offence where the maximum imprisonment is two (2) years less a day. Where a charge of uttering threats is brought, the context of the alleged threat and therefore whether any genuine threat was truly uttered requires careful review. There are various defence strategies that may be available and applicable when defending an uttering threats charge.
The Law
The conduct that may give rise to an uttering threats charge is prescribed at section 264.1(1) of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, wherein it is said:
Uttering threats
264.1 (1) Every one commits an offence who, in any manner, knowingly utters, conveys or causes any person to receive a threat
(a) to cause death or bodily harm to any person;
(b) to burn, destroy or damage real or personal property; or
(c) to kill, poison or injure an animal or bird that is the property of any person.
Interestingly, a person may be charged with uttering threats without even uttering the threat directly towards the targeted person. A threat uttered about a targeted person that is heard by a person other than the targeted person is enough to result in an uttering threats charge. In fact, the targeted person towards whom the threat was uttered may be without any knowledge whatsoever that a threat was even made.
Potential Penalties
The potential penalties upon conviction on a charge of uttering threats are quite serious. The potential penalties are dependant upon the nature of the specific threat and are prescribed within section 264.1(2) of the Criminal Code where it is said:
Punishment
(2) Every one who commits an offence under paragraph (1)(a) is guilty of
(a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years; or
(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.
Idem
(3) Every one who commits an offence under paragraph (1)(b) or (c)
(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or
(b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
Available Defence Strategies
The definition of what actually constitutes as an uttered threat requires careful analysis. Diligent legal counsel will review the, allegedly, threatening words and provide appropriate defence strategy advice to the accused person. The specific defence strategies that will be available, meaning logically applicable, to the defence of an uttering threats charge will depend upon the specific utterances involved; however, the strategies commonly applicable to an uttering threats charge include:
Learn More About Uttering Threats Charges...
Here are links to four (4) other webpages:
Conclusion
The charge of uttering threats may involve a penalty of up to five (5) years in jail if prosecuted as an indictable offence or up to two (2) years less a day in jail if prosecuted as a summary conviction offence. Other potential consequences may also arise. A strong defence strategy to aggressively defend an uttering threats charge is well warranted.
NOTE: A considerable amount of searches featuring “lawyers near me” or “best lawyer in” frequently indicate a desire for prompt and adept legal assistance rather than a specific title of a legal professional. In Ontario, licensed paralegals fall under the regulation of the same Law Society that governs lawyers, allowing them to represent clients in specified litigation matters. Their role hinges on advocacy, legal analysis, and expertise in procedure. Hogan Paralegal Services provides legal representation within its licensed mandate/scope, focusing on strategic positioning, preparation of evidence, and compelling advocacy aimed at securing effective and advantageous resolutions for clients.

